Syria: China, Iran and Pakistan Oppose U.S.

On 9 August 2012, Pakistan formally joined the group of countries rejecting prospects of foreign intervention in Syria in favour of the Syrian government. The decision came in the international consultative meeting hosted by Iran and attended by representatives from Russia, China, Belarus, Mauritania, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Georgia, Turkmenistan, Benin, Sri Lanka, Ecuador, Afghanistan, Algeria, Iraq, Zimbabwe, Oman, Venezuela, Tajikistan, India, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Nicaragua, Cuba, Sudan, Jordan, Tunisia and Palestine.

Whether the decision came as a result of Pakistan’s recently increased cooperation with Iran in order to enhance regional control over foreign relations and energy resources, or as a result of China’s blunt veto on the draft resolutions presented against the Syrian government in the United Nations, Pakistan’s stance is now crystal clear. It is sure to irk the American led Western lobby against Bashar-al-Assad of Syria. Previously Pakistan had only abstained from voting on an anti-Syria resolution in the United Nationas Security Council. Now, however, Pakistan has dared to clearly ally with the anti-US and anti-Western league of countries on the issue of Syria.

Pakistan sided with Iran, China and Russia in opposing foreign intervention in Syria on the principle that the international community must respect the sovereignty of Syrian borders and help negotiate a peaceful outcome instead of starting another war. The policy results from Pakistan’s own suffering at the hands of American drone strikes along its Western borders that has provoked strong resentment among the people in Pakistan. Drones, combines with US strikes in the OBL raid in May 2011 and the Salala check-post attack in November 2011, damaged the nation’s self-esteem by violating the sovereignty of Pakistani borders.

The decision to support the Syrian government against foreign intervention is significant in that it underscores Pakistan’s shift in international policies from being the strongest non-NATO ally of the US in almost all policy matters to tilting towards the China-Pakistan-Iran regional trio as the power centre radically opposite to the US stance. It may also give substance to increasing multi-polarity in the world with China being the economic giant threatening America, not with war but with global markets.

Some six months ago American analysts on CNN (Fareed Zakaria and colleagues) had predicted the alliance of Iran, Syria, shia-governed-Iraq, Libya, Mohamed Morsi’s Egypt and China supported by armed attacks on Israel by the Iranian backed Hezbollah, in case of an Israeli strike on Iran. The picture these analysts sketched, however, appears to be evolving in support of the Syrian government. With the addition of Pakistan in this equation, and US preparations for an end game in Afghanistan, the situation could not get more troubling for US foreign policy think tanks.

Having said that, as welcomes as the decision for regional cooperation and defiance against foreign interventions is for Pakistan, it would also be to the long-term benefit of India to fall out of the blatantly pro-US foreign policy paradigm and instead back regional cooperation led by China, Pakistan and Iran. India must come out of its shell of old grudges against Pakistan and China and follow the policy of non-alignment that its great leader Jawaharlal Nehru had advocated for over half a century ago.



Filed under Afghanistan, Discussion, NATO, Politics, Syria, The Middle East

6 responses to “Syria: China, Iran and Pakistan Oppose U.S.

  1. Therealkumail

    Finally our leadership either independently or under coercion (from China) has taken a stance which is a marked and major shift from its rigorous kow towing the western policy diktat…..good for PAKISTAN…even if this policy shift will increase foreign (Saudi, Qatari sponsored terrorism) at home particularly in Karachi.

  2. As the editor I would like to make clear that the regime in Syria is a joke and should be deleted. The Beating Heart of Arab Nationalism must be freed from the Assad regime …

  3. Regarding the peace establishment in Syria, all the countries( veto countries including security council members) should have one voice& the same goal. If some one is doing well, other should support & cooperate it. We should give up egoism , there is an issue of world peace establishment instead of increasing multi-polarity in the world with China. Thus, let give a chance to establish peace in the region, if possible, some may also cooperate and support for the same. The policy” I don’t want to do it, and no one also can do the same” may be extremist’s ideology.However, “peace without voice is not peace, its a fear”, they can establish harmonious relationship with partnership solidarity among all participant. If some one is involved with the aim of establishing peace in the region, we should praise instead of boycotting the plans for the same, or opposing allies can give valuable suggestion to the concerned parties. Because, there never was a good war or a bad peace.
    There is not a question of winning a war, but there is a question -how we can con-quire peace. Peace and security are interrelated with each other. Thus, we can not find peace by avoiding life in that region.I wish all the best for peace in the region, If those allies are totally at peace with themselves, no one can shake them. Do continue the job for world peace not for individual goal, people of the world are may be with you.

  4. What I’ve tried to depict here in this blog is not what should and should not be done with the ‘regime’ in Syria because that view differs from one analyst/ observes/ person to the other. What matters is the tilt of Pakistan’s foreign policy in the long term benefit of the country.

  5. ahmad temsah

    What a democratic and human twist to support the butcher and demonize the lambs ! Maybe the Pakistani government should reconsider its stand towards the Syrian people whom their ruler is slaughtering everyday !

  6. alijanness

    The Only solution to the Syrian situation is for all the Islamic nations to work to gather and try get some negotiations going between the opposition and the government only after the saudi, qatri and usa backed terrorists are removed from syria.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s